Revista Phoenix

Categorie: Numărul 71-72

UN OM PRINTRE OAMENI…

Profesorul Cărpenaru se ridicase deasupra lumii noastre de mai multă vreme. Nu de acum. Se ridicase dea­supra lumii încet, fără zbatere și, mai ales, fără regret. Profesorul Cărpenaru s‑a ridicat deasupra lumii noastre îm­păcat, știind că lasă lucrurile așezate și, mai ales, neîntinate. Profesorul Cărpenaru s‑a ridicat deasupra lumii noastre cu lumină și, mai ales, […]

Citește mai mult...

UN AN FĂRĂ PROF. UNIV. DR. ION TURCU

În[i]urmă cu un an[ii] a plecat de lângă noi domnul profesor universitar Ion Turcu, unul dintre cei mai influenți și prolifici teoreticieni ai dreptului, care a contribuit la dezvoltarea profesiei de practician în insolvență încă de la începuturile ei în România. Redăm câteva fragmente dintr‑un interviu acordat de domnul profesor publicației Universul Juridic în iulie […]

Citește mai mult...

DESCHIDEREA PROCEDURII INSOLVENȚEI ÎN ANUL 2020

ABSTRACT The insolvency procedure can be initiated at the request of the insolvent debtor or the justified request of the creditor, in accordance with Law No. 85/2014 Law no. 55/2020 on measures preventing and combating the effects of the Covid‑19 pandemic has instated derogations and new rules for the initiation of the collective procedure KEYWORDS: […]

Citește mai mult...

CREANŢELE CURENTE ÎN PROCEDURA INSOLVENŢEI

ABSTRACT   Receivables born after the launch of insolvency proceedings, from activities unfolded by the debtor, are current receivables and are paid in accordance with the documents that generate them. The creditor needs to formulate a request for payment, which is later analysed by the judicial administrator. Non‑payment of current receivables can lead to the […]

Citește mai mult...

CUM FUNCȚIONEAZĂ ANGAJAMENTUL UNILATERAL PREVĂZUT DE REGULAMENTUL (UE) 2015/848 CA ALTERNATIVĂ LA PROCEDURA SECUNDARĂ DE INSOLVENȚĂ, ÎN ROMÂNIA ȘI ÎN UNGARIA?

ABSTRACT The 2015/848/EU Regulation (EIR‑R) on insolvency proceedings contains a new instrument, undertaking, in the Article no. 36 ‑ 38, which has not been known before in the continental legal systems. This article describes the current efforts at national level to develop the undertaking as an efficient mechanism, even in the absence of a legal […]

Citește mai mult...

CONFIGURAREA CADRELOR DE REMITERE DE DATORIE ŞI DECĂDERI ÎN LUMINA PREVEDERILOR DIRECTIVEI PRIVIND RESTRUCTURAREA PREVENTIVĂ

ABSTRACT The objectives established by the Directive in relation to procedures concerning discharge of debt and disqualifications aim at blurring the differences between national laws, by implementing a set of principles meant to harmonize the current regulatory framework. This approach also aims to increase the efficiency of the existing procedures, by adopting measures that make […]

Citește mai mult...

COMENTARII REFERITOARE LA APLICAREA ORDONANŢEI GUVERNULUI NR. 6/2019 PRIVIND INSTITUIREA UNOR FACILITĂȚI FISCALE

ABSTRACT Perhaps insufficiently known and applied in business, Government Ordinance no. 6/2019 can be described as a legislative frame for restructuring, outside the confines of judicial procedures, targeting past‑due fiscal obligations. For a coherent and predictable application, this important normative act requires clarifications on the functionality of key elements, as well as answers to questions […]

Citește mai mult...

MĂSURI NECESARE PENTRU TRANSPUNEREA REGLEMENTĂRILOR EUROPENE PE INSOLVENŢĂ ŞI RESTRUCTURARE ÎN CADRUL LEGISLATIV NAŢIONAL

ABSTRACT By July 17, 2021, Romanian lawmakers will need to transpose Directive (EU) 2019/1023 on preventive restructuring frameworks, on discharge of debt and disqualifications, and on measures to increase the efficiency of procedures concerning restructuring, insolvency and discharge of debt, and amending Directive (EU) 2017/1132 (Directive on restructuring and insolvency) (“Directive 2019/1023”). The Directive aims […]

Citește mai mult...

ASPECTE RELEVANTE DERIVÂND DIN TESTUL DE COMPATIBILITATE DINTRE PROCEDURA INSOLVENȚEI ȘI ALTE LEGISLAȚII

ABSTRACT In this paper, we are taking into consideration (i) an analysis of the de plano permission granted to a bidder in a public procurement procedure, should said bidder qualify, when the bidder is insolvent, and (ii) what would be considered reasonable standards of evidence for such qualification, in an interpretation correlated with certain normative […]

Citește mai mult...

STAREA DE URGENȚĂ SUSPENDĂ PROCEDURA INSOLVENȚEI SAU DOAR JUDECATA? IMPACTUL INSTITUIRII STĂRII DE URGENȚĂ ASUPRA CELOR MAI IMPORTANTE TERMENE PREVĂZUTE DE LEGEA INSOLVENȚEI

ABSTRACT The state of emergency initiated through Presidential Decree no. 195/2020, extended through Presidential Decree no. 240/2020, has raised a series of challenges in interpreting how insolvency procedures were impacted by the measure to suspend civil trials in courts, The insolvency procedure, per se, is not suspended. The measures refered solely to activity in court. […]

Citește mai mult...