Revista Phoenix Revista de Insolvență
  • Acasă
  • Despre
  • Procesul de recenzare
  • Revista pdf
  • Universul Insolvenței
  • Contact

Autor: ANDREEA DELI

  • Home
  • Bogdan Georgescu

ANALIZA NAŞTERII UNOR GARANŢII ATIPICE, ÎN CADRUL PERIOADEI DE OBSERVAŢIE (SAU INDIVIDUALISMUL CONCURSUAL AL GARANŢIILOR ÎN INSOLVENŢĂ)

  • ANDREEA DELI

ABSTRACT The funding that can be granted during insolvency proceedings (new funding) uses a special type of guarantees, which international insolvency law calls „superpriorities”, and which can be legally considered mortgages. The behaviour of these guarantees during insolvency involves substantial exceptions from common law, as their nature puts them above pre-existing guarantees, in violation of […]

Citește mai mult...

GARANŢIILE ATIPICE ÎN CADRUL PROCEDURII DE INSOLVENŢĂ. GARANŢIILE CONSTITUITE ANTERIOR DESCHIDERII PROCEDURII

  • FLAVIUS IANCU MOŢU

ABSTRACT As opposed to a typical preference case, on a determined individual asset, atypical guarantees are characterized by „fluidity”, as they cover universalities of assets or receivables assigned as guarantees. There are no specific provisions in the New Civil Code or in Law no. 85/2014 on the crystallization of asset universality with such atypical preference […]

Citește mai mult...

CINE E COMPETENT SĂ JUDECE EXECUTĂRILE SILITE DEMARATE ÎMPOTRIVA DEBITOAREI?

  • ADRIAN ŞTEFAN CLOPOTARI

ABSTRACT Beyond the arguments supporting or combating the right to foreclose the assets of an insolvent debtor, one question remains: who gets to judge these arguments? Right now, jurisprudence is split, so practitioners perform a doubled effort, challenging the foreclosure before a syndic judge as well as a regular judge of the court. In order […]

Citește mai mult...

Interviu

  • EMILIAN RADU

  Nicolae Cîrstea: Suntem împreună cu dl Emilian Radu, Preşedinte de onoare al Uniunii Naţionale a Practicienilor în Insolvenţă şi, de asemenea, primul preşedinte în această organizaţie de 20 de ani a profesiei de practician în insolvenţă. Greşesc? Emilian Radu: Nu, aşa este. N.C.: Cum au fost începuturile, domnule Preşedinte? Care sunt lucrurile care vă […]

Citește mai mult...

O SCURTĂ ISTORIE A PROCEDURILOR DE PRE INSOLVENŢĂ ÎN ROMÂNIA (PARTEA I)

  • NICOLAE PREPELIȚĂ

ABSTRACT The article presents a history of extrajudicial and pre-insolvency restructuring procedures, which have been regulated in Romania since the 19th century. The analysis deals in particular with the conventions concluded between the bankrupt debtor and its creditors, in the bankruptcy procedures regulated since the first commercial code introduced in Romania in 1840, and finishing […]

Citește mai mult...

CARE ESTE ORDINEA DE PRIORITATE A CREANŢELOR ASOCIAŢILOR?

  • ADRIAN ŞTEFAN CLOPOTARI

ABSTRACT The claims of the associates have always been shrouded in a dose of mystery. This finding is only partly due to the lack of regulation of insolvency law. As a matter of fact, the law of insolvency does not create rules of law, but only customizes those that exist. The issue of the claims […]

Citește mai mult...

ANALIZA UNOR CRITERII DE STABILIRE A COMPATIBILITĂŢII DINTRE INSOLVENŢĂ ŞI PROCEDURA CIVILĂ (PARTEA I)

  • ANDREEA DELI

ABSTRACT The issue of compatibility between insolvency proceedings and common law generates many of the most complex legal issues. The specific nature of the rules governing insolvency matters sometimes comes in accordance with the rules of civil procedure or, as the case may be, with other regulations, in which case, the interpreter faces the issue […]

Citește mai mult...

CODEBITORII SOLIDARI ÎN PROCEDURA INSOLVENŢEI Studiu de caz

  • MARCELA COMŞA

ABSTRACT Usually, the legal relationship of obligations is established between two persons – creditor and debtor, but there are also obligations with a plurality of subjects. Solidarity is presumed between debtors of an obligation contracted in the course of a business. If one, two or more debtors who are jointly and severally liable are insolvent, […]

Citește mai mult...

ANALIZA ASPECTELOR DE NOUTATE ADUSE DE O.U.G. NR. 88/2018 LA CODUL INSOLVENŢEI

  • ANDREEA DELI, SIMONA MARIA MILOŞ

ABSTRACT This study aims to synthetically analyze the main changes that GEO no. 88/2018 brings to insolvency, sorting them by: ”substantial changes” – with negative effects throughout the procedure, which could potentially harm the very essence and balance of the regulation, ”beneficial changes”, which will increase stability, and ”unclear changes”, which may lead to contradictory […]

Citește mai mult...

INFRACŢIUNEA DE BANCRUTĂ SIMPLĂ DUPĂ O.U.G. NR. 88/2018

  • ANTONIU OBANCIA

ABSTRACT A debtor facing overwhelming fiscal debt cannot file for insolvency. The financial and accountancy assessment imposed through legal amendments, according to relevant case law, increases the state of confusion of the debtor in choosing between a lawful or an unlawful conduct as per the Article 240 of the Criminal Code (non compliance with the […]

Citește mai mult...

Navigare în articole

Prev 1 … 4 5 6 … 9 Următoarea

Arhiva revistă

  • Numărul 62
  • Numărul 61
  • Numărul 75-76
  • Numărul 73-74
  • Numărul 71-72
  • Numărul 70
  • Numărul 69
  • Numărul 68
  • Numărul 67
  • Numărul 66
  • Numărul 65
  • Numărul 64
  • Numărul 63

Evenimente

  • Conferința Națională „Executarea silită: între disponibilitate și rol activ” (10 pct.)
  • Seminar Online: Art. 169 – Răspunderea Civilă Pentru Starea De Insolvență A Debitorului (4 Pct.)
  • Conferința Națională „Prevenirea Și Combaterea Spălării Banilor. Impactul Noii Legi Asupra Profesiilor Liberale”, Ediția A II-A (6 Pct.)

 

Apariții editoriale

© Copyright UNPIR 2021
Toate drepturile rezervate.